Pages 989–1032, https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/avae009
How does variation in the severity of punishment affect public opinion toward the reintegration of former enemy “collaborators” after war?
Pages 930–988, https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/avae006
When conducting judicial review of administrative decisions using a deferential standard of review, courts should give a greater role to the decision maker’s responsiveness to the interests of the community of judgment—those directly affected by the decision.
Pages 900–929, https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/avae010
The question the present Article poses is whether a fourth pattern of law is now necessary to capture the new technological state of affairs and the new geopolitical balances of power: in particular, should a rule of smart law be introduced?
Pages 853–899, https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/avae007
Scholars in recent years have shown interest in challenging the historical origins of international law and its normative claims to universality.
Pages 789–852, https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/avae005
In the United States, Canada, Israel, Australia, and many parts of Europe, conflicts between religious liberty and gender equality (including LGBTQ equality) are understood and analyzed as “culture wars.”